Goal Line Report
Next entry: What to make of the Tampa Bay Lightning
Previous entry: No Surprise Here
Why is this still happening?
by Patrick Hoffman on 10/04/08 at 07:30 PM ET
Comments (4)
The New York Rangers dominated the Tampa Bay Lightning this afternoon in Prague and yet, only won by a score of 2-1, thanks to a late third period power play goal from second year man Brandon Dubinsky.
Is this a continuation from last season? Are the Rangers going to outshoot every team by a two-to-one margin and score just one or two goals? You would figure that after firing 40 shots against the defensively weak Tampa Bay Lightning, they would have more than just two goals. However, the Blueshirts made Lightning netminder Mike Smith look like Patrick Roy and also went 1-6 on the power play.
So I ask, again, why is this still happening?
Now, I am not complaining that the Rangers won a hockey game. This is a game that they deserved to win because they controlled the majority of the play. What I am questioning is why the scoreboard doesn’t show it.
From the first period on, the Rangers put pucks to the net, skated around effortlessly in the Lightning’s defensive zone and won many battles along the boards. However, the game should have been put away early in the third period after Smith got stung on the left forearm by a Dan Girardi shot from the point.
Smith was clearly in pain and yet, after he was hurt, the Rangers didn’t dare shoot up high on him. Was I asking for the Rangers to hurt Smith? No. What I was looking for the Rangers to do was exploit the injury and make him move his arm by shooting up high.
The power play is another issue. With guys like Markus Naslund, Nikolai Zherdev, Wade Redden, Scott Gomez and Chris Drury, scoring a power play goal shouldn’t be too difficult. Yet, the Rangers found a way to go 1-6 with the man advantage despite totaling 12 shots on the power play.
There were also times when the puck was loose in the crease and they had Smith scrambling like a fish out of water and they still couldn’t put the puck in the net. The Rangers have the arsenal to put teams away this year and if they want to have any kind of success this year, they need to do it early and often.
Despite my early negativity, there were a lot of things that I liked about the Rangers’ play this afternoon. First off, I never have a problem with throwing the puck at the net. The Blueshirts were not afraid to shoot the puck tonight and unlike last season, it was nice to see them shoot when they had the room to.
The team’s newcomers all had great games for the Rangers. Naslund scored his first goal as a Ranger this afternoon (it was night time in Prague) and had an array of scoring opportunities. Zherdev blocked a few shots, fired some of his own and skated hard every shift, something he was not known for doing in Columbus.
Lastly, Rangers’ netminder Henrik Lundqvist turned in a strong performance, especially in the first period when he shut down the likes of Vincent Lecavalier, Vinny Prospal and Martin St. Louis. As long as his defensemen allow him to see the puck, he’s gonna stop it.
All in all, I’m satisfied that the Rangers won the game but I would like to see a bit more finish. If they can do that, this could be quite a good season for the New York Rangers.
Filed in: | Goal Line Report | Permalink
Tags: Brandon+Dubinsky, Chris+Drury, Henrik+Lundqvist, Markus+Naslund, Martin+St.+Louis, Mike+Smith, Nikolai+Zherdev, Scott+Gomez, Vincent+Lecavalier,
Comments
Don’t let Z fool you. He will start out the season playing hard and then slowly become the Z we knew in CBUS. Next year he will be back home in Russia playing.
Posted by tg on 10/04/08 at 11:40 PM ET
I’ve been saying it all summer, last year was a PP coaching disaster and had NOTHING to do with Jagr’s and Shanny’s play… Some reason we thought we needed to get younger even though the cup winners are the oldest team and we were already one of the youngest teams in the league. Now we’re even younger, only 2nd to Chicago. This team will take a step back. Think about this, there are no pre-lockout Rangers left on the Roster. Can you be successful with such an unstable roster? I don’t think so.
Posted by bcrt on 10/05/08 at 12:22 AM ET
in my eyes it’s good there are no pre-lockout rangers left. do you remember how those teams played?
i hate to see tyutin go. but you gotta break some eggs. we’ll see if zherdev’s got it in him. i won’t hold my breath.
other than shanahan (for purely sentimental reasons), i won’t much miss the losses. jagr’s fun to watch when he’s in a gd mood. but oh so fickle.
this team isnt winning the cup. but shld make the playoffs for a few years.
the coaching is sometimes dubious to me. but not as dubious as the GM.
speaking of questionable coaching, glad to see ryan hollweg on a different team.
because of curiosity i lookt at the 2003-4 roster. the two remainders are blair betts and valiquette.
i’d be thankful not to have that roster. most of those guys are retired or out of the league. a few are still effective players. some are career bubble players.
holik and kovalev can still play. as can tyutin. i’d hire any of those guys. & maybe dominic moore’d be a gd grinder.
i’ll take chris drury & scott gomez.
Posted by mindbum on 10/05/08 at 12:48 PM ET
Add a Comment
Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.
Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.
Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.
Most Recent Blog Posts
About Goal Line Report
The Goal Line Report will focus on all things Eastern Conference. Do I have a bias towards the Eastern Conference just because I am a New Yorker? No, but it certainly does make things easier! I’ll make my opinions known on Eastern Conference news bits (as often as I can), big games, hot and cold players, trades (I don’t make things up) and anything and everything else related to the Eastern Conference that I think is important for hockey fans to know. I will, in every sense of the word, be the beast of the East while also making sure to drop my thoughts on other hockey news items.
I, Patrick Hoffman, have covered the NHL since 2003 and have worked for a variety of hockey media sources including: Stan Fischler, Spector’s Hockey, TheHockeyNews.com, HockeyBuzz.com, McKeen’s Hockey, Blueshirt Bulletin, XM Home Ice Channel Hockey Blog, HockeyPrimeTime.com, FantasyHockey.com. NY SportsDay, and HokejaVestnesis.com.
For questions, comments or to talk hockey, feel free to send me an e-mail at .
Yeah, and last year we said the same thing with Gomez, Drury, Shanahan, Jagr, and Straka on the PP. Maybe it’s not the personnel. Hard to tell after preseason and 1 regular season game, but if we’re still saying this in December, maybe Perry Pearn should have the control of the PP unit taken away from him. Last year’s PP units were ridiculous and excruciating to watch and if I have to watch that again I might just change the channel for the 2 minutes. I mean, it got to the point where even the players were saying they’d rather decline the penalty!
Other than that, it was an OK game. I still don’t understand how Dawes, who has been so invisible that I sometimes don’t know he’s in the lineup until halfway through the game, gets PP time and Prucha doesn’t. The Rangers were 1-7 on the PP, btw, not 1-6. Here’s hoping for a little more finish, as you say, tomorrow. Though I think Olie the Goalie usually plays well vs. NY.
Posted by K24 from NYC on 10/04/08 at 08:13 PM ET