Kukla's Korner

Kukla's Korner Hockey

Next entry: Carey Price Looking Forward To Training Camp

Previous entry: Therrien Happy With The Core Players

Beware Of The Big Headed Player

from Joanne of the Laucius Ottawa Citizen via the Leader-Post,

Fatheaded hockey players are more aggressive than their slimmer-faced counterparts, a St. Catharines, Ont., study has found.

Results of the study published Wednesday in the prestigious Proceedings of the Royal Society, concluded of the six Canadian-based NHL teams, the faces of the Ottawa Senators are dead giveaways when it comes to predicting how much time players spend in the penalty box.

“We’re not saying that Ottawa is more aggressive than any other team. But each individual player’s face predicts how much time he had in the box,” said Brock University neuroscience researcher Justin Carre.

continued

Filed in: NHL Teams, Ottawa Senators | KK Hockey | Permalink
 

Comments

underthechestnuttree's avatar

HaHaHa!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology

Posted by underthechestnuttree from LaSalle, Ontario, Canada on 08/21/08 at 10:35 AM ET

Avatar

These people obviously never took a statistics class. Their numbers are extraordinarily inconclusive to be published. It looks like there’s a greater probability of no correlation whatsoever than a positive correlation.

Posted by Muéro on 08/21/08 at 01:54 PM ET

Avatar

I’m not really a super-stats-man, Muéro, but I don’t think that’s the case.

A low correlation coefficient implies a weak correlation, not that no correlation exists.  There are plenty of examples of very real weak correlations.  A poor example off the top of my head might be the correlation between draft position and career points for hockey players—an early pick won’t always do well, but he’s statistically more likely to than a later pick.

If there were no correlation, one would expect a study of a random hockey team to find a positive correlation roughly 50% of the time.  They only looked at six teams, but each had a positive correlation.  This gives us a (very rough estimate of the) p-value of about 3.1%.  Or in other words, if there really is no correlation, the probability of getting a result this unlikely is about 3.1%—pretty low.  Basically, there’s a good chance that some correlation exists.

P.S. This isn’t a real statistical analysis, which would take too much time and research for me to do.  It’s only meant to be instructive.  Don’t mistreat it.

Posted by Ryan from Toronto on 08/21/08 at 05:46 PM ET

Avatar

A low correlation coefficient implies a weak correlation, not that no correlation exists.  There are plenty of examples of very real weak correlations.

You’re right, Ryan.

A correlation coefficient can be thought of roughly as how much of the variability observed in a parameter Y (penalty minutes) is explained or associated with the variability in X (face width).  A positive number indicates that the two parameters vary in the same direction - as one increases, so does the other.  The number close to zero (which would mean no correlation whatsoever) indicates that the variability in face width only “accounts for” a small proportion of the variability in penalty minutes, with the rest of the variability in penalty minutes accounted for by other factors.

A low number does not mean a weak correlation in the sense of being inconclusive - there are other statistical tests for that (strength of relationship), and I’m sure those are covered in the original paper.  Most people are clueless about stats so they never make it into something intended for general readership like a newspaper without being a bit distorted.

Posted by Baroque from Michigan on 08/21/08 at 10:13 PM ET

Avatar

A correlation coefficient can be thought of roughly as how much of the variability observed in a parameter Y (penalty minutes) is explained or associated with the variability in X (face width).  A positive number indicates that the two parameters…

Dear God, let’s get this season started before we all go mad. smile

Posted by OlderThanChelios from Grand Rapids on 08/22/08 at 10:16 AM ET

Avatar

Dear God, let’s get this season started before we all go mad.

What?  Did I screw up the definition somewhere?  smile

Posted by Baroque from Michigan on 08/22/08 at 12:03 PM ET

Add a Comment

Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.

Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.

Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Feed

Most Recent Blog Posts

About KK Hockey

Paul Kukla founded Kukla’s Korner in 2005 and the site has since become the must-read site on the ‘net for all the latest happenings around the NHL. 

From breaking news to in-depth stories around the league, KK Hockey is updated with fresh stories all day long and will bring you the latest news as quickly as possible.

Email Paul anytime at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

image
image




When learning from experts it’s best to learn personally from them, or from their blog. We can provide that with poker lessons blog, your home to learn poker personally.

Do you get shocked from the luck in the game of poker? Stop getting shocked and start being a Poker Shoker

Make extra cash while playing online poker. Rakeback is free and comes with rake races.

 

high yield savings account

Kukla’s Korner is always a free service for readers, but it costs some money to maintain. If you’re ever in a position to donate a few dollars to help out, we’d be very appreciative.

 




 


Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
$ USD
You will pay at least $1.00USD
Sign up for

 

Another way to help KK.