Poor Bob, only 4 weeks late to the party (see: Game 7, Flyers vs. Caps).

I don’t see the analogy to the high sticking review; whether or not the puck makes contact with a stick above the crossbar is not a subjective call, it has a clear, objective criterion.  The boundary between incidental contact and goaltender interference, however, is subjective, and leagues try to stay away from using video replay to overturn subjective calls.

Sure, this is an example where video replay shows the on-ice official was clearly hallucinating, but that’s no reason to change the system.  It was simply a horrible call.

The last part of the video review rule 39.4 states “The video review process shall be permitted to assist the referees in
determining the legitimacy of all potential goals (e.g. to ensure they are “good hockey goals”).”. Since there is no definition of a “good hockey goal” you can reveiw any goal for any reason. Falling on a goalie while the puck is put in the net is not (in my interpretation) a good hockey goal and therefore subject to review.