Kukla's Korner Hockey
Next entry: Blues Looking To Boyes For Goals
Previous entry: Burke & His Team
Not Buying Melrose Excuse
by Paul on 11/20/08 at 12:58 PM ET
Comments (7)
from Jim Kelley at Sports Illustrated,
Melrose got fired because he didn’t know what he was doing.
He might think it was because his players didn’t like that he publically chastised them after the first two games of the season (in Europe no less) or that he resorted to his celebrated cold-shoulder approach when he walked out of the locker room and left them to practice on their own the day before a game just prior to his being dismissed, but that’s hardly the case.
He got fired because he didn’t do game-prep well, manage his players and bench effectively, and was regularly outcoached by opponents, many of whom knew what they were doing behind the bench and took advantage of the fact that Melrose did not have a clue.
Filed in: NHL Teams, Tampa Bay Lightning | KK Hockey | Permalink
Tags: Barry+Melrose,
Comments
Good team, great team, whatever, the point is that they should have been a lot better than they are, and most of it is Melrose’s fault. He messed up everything. He had no idea how to handle any of his players, especially the big name guys like Vinny, St. Louis, and Stamkos. The Melrose experiment was an utter and complete failure, and with all the many problems in Tampa, he was the biggest problem, and thats pretty sad. If the owners hadn’t kicked Tortorella out, I guarantee this team would be a ton better than they are.
Posted by Kevin from Pittsburgh on 11/20/08 at 01:40 PM ET
Not normally one to dance on anyone’s grave.... but I’ll make an exception here.
The Mullet was never worth a squat as a coach other than having #99 on a team.
He shouldn’t have been hired in the first place. At least Tortorella had more than an expensive ugly suit and and empty Mullet sporting head.
Posted by MOWingsfan19 on 11/20/08 at 02:33 PM ET
Any team that trades Dan Boyle for Matt Carle and signs Gary Roberts is a joke. And since when is Stamkos a star.....? Joe Thornton scored 5 goals in his rookie year and he was alot better than Stamkos. As GM I would have assumed Stamkos was going to stink. To expect anything else you would have to be a moron
Posted by kevin from boston on 11/20/08 at 02:51 PM ET
As Gary Green has said, hockey is not a complicated game so I believe that it is the players which must be held accountable for their actions. As Melrose has said, they are all big boys and multi-millionaires to boot. Too bad if they do not like being called out after they play like crap. The captain should have said something to motivate his players and maybe take some of the blame for no goals being scored. Instead they just go storming up to the owner’s box and cry about the coach. This team will go down in flames before it gets any better. Being fired was the best thing that could have happened to Melrose. He came to a team that not only got older, but trades away one of the best d-men in the league, replaces him with an unknown quanitity and then signs Marek Malik ? Happiness is Tampa in the rear view mirror.
Posted by Mike from LI from LI, NY on 11/20/08 at 02:54 PM ET
Someone get this man a proofreader!
“couldn’t find away to rebound”
“Though it took time and a painful learning process; they respected Tortorella for the effort.”
“he was two tough on them”
My goodness.
Posted by Sunny from Raleigh, NC on 11/20/08 at 03:00 PM ET
Show me one team that just threw 10-15 new guys together and they were great from the get go....
apparently Herb Brooks through something together in 1980...entirely different circumstances I know, but it has happened. Not that The Mullet could hold a candle to Herb Brooks in his prime. In fact, that style of short-term gain, long-term pain kind of coaching has usually proven quite ineffective with the Pros. But you tell me a better way of coaching to bring a team together? If you can maybe Tampa will hire you...can I get some odds on that Coach Rick?
Posted by Animal Drew from A Nightmare on Helm Street on 11/20/08 at 03:00 PM ET
Add a Comment
Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.
Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.
Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.
Most Recent Blog Posts
Dealing With A Make-Shift Lineup
Sutter Trying To Find The Fire In The Flames
Cory Stillman Out With Knee Injury
What’s Troubling The Avalanche?
Rangers Need More Consistent Play
Let’s Practice- On, Off, On, Off
About KK Hockey
Paul Kukla founded Kukla’s Korner in 2005 and the site has since become the must-read site on the ‘net for all the latest happenings around the NHL.
From breaking news to in-depth stories around the league, KK Hockey is updated with fresh stories all day long and will bring you the latest news as quickly as possible.
Email Paul anytime at
Kukla’s Korner is always a free service for readers, but it costs some money to maintain. If you’re ever in a position to donate a few dollars to help out, we’d be very appreciative.

Exactly how do they have a good team....? They have two top players. One (St Louis) is vastly overrated. Spotty goaltending. No quality defensemen. A bunch of old guys up front. This team could be decent if everything comes together. Most likely they would be average. 5-7-5 is an indication of that. They sold this team like they would be great. NO WAY that would ever happen this year. Show me one team that just threw 10-15 new guys together and they were great from the get go....
Posted by kevin from boston on 11/20/08 at 01:31 PM ET