Kukla's Korner

Mike Chen's Hockey Blog

Next entry: A Little Separation?

Previous entry: Standings, Points-Per-Game Style

Undeserved? Maybe. Necessary? Probably.

It ain’t easy being Pittsburgh GM Ray Shero. One minute you’re being hailed as a genius for getting the youthful Pittsburgh Penguins within two wins of the Stanley Cup. The next minute, you’re firing coaches and looking at your awfully thin roster.

Of course, you could say that about any GM in pro sports – it’s pretty much a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately business. And while the recent firing of Michel Therrien may not have exactly been warranted, it was the time-tested adage in sports: you can’t trade the entire roster, so you fire the coach.

Was Therrien the right coach for the Penguins? Like just about any coach, Therrien wasn’t perfect. He brought a mix of good and bad to the table, and his heavy-handed style came with an expiration date. However, to cite Therrien as the primary catalyst in the Penguins’ Stanley Cup Final hangover is simply inaccurate. Shero made his share of mistakes, but there were things out of his control:

-Marian Hossa: Would things have been different had Marian Hossa selected Pittsburgh over Detroit? One has to think that Hossa’s point-per-game rate would have prevented the constant need to play Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby on the same line. Maybe Hossa didn’t like the way the water tasted in Pittsburgh or maybe he couldn’t get over the fact that a Jean-Claude Van Damme movie (the classic action flick Sudden Death) was once made in Mellon Arena. Whatever the case, three superstars would have certainly been better than two.

-Sergei Gonchar/Ryan Whitney: Injuries happen. It’s part of the game, and you have to adapt. Both Whitney and Gonchar are too critical to the Penguin power play to disappear without some on-ice trickle-down. The Penguins power play is an ugly 16.1%; had Gonchar and Whitney been around for a full campaign, it’s easy to see that the Penguins would have clicked at a much better rate. Considering how tight just about every NHL game is, those extra power play goals could have made a great difference.

-Jordan Staal: Some players take longer to develop than others. In his third season, Staal continues to bounce between flashes of greatness and disappearing acts. For most young players, this might be more acceptable. However, Staal’s high draft status (2nd overall) and pedigree (brother Eric has had at least 70 points in every year following his rookie season) explain why many Penguin fans are frustrated with Staal’s development. After a sophomore slump, many expected Staal to finally breakout with some consistency. As it stands, Staal is projected to have about 45 points – just about what he had during his rookie year.

-Ryan Malone: Money talks, and Malone’s absurd Tampa Bay offer was something that Shero (or any sane GM) couldn’t afford. While the Lightning overpaid Malone, his combination grit, skill, and leadership would be missed on any team. Malone’s in-your-face style brought its share of ugly goals to the Penguins lineup – something sorely missed on the Penguin power play. After all, someone’s gotta screen the goalie.

Should Miroslav Satan and Ruslan Fedotenko shoulder some of the blame? They’re easy scapegoats, but if you look at their post-lockout stats, it’s obvious that they were more of a gamble than anything else. In a best-case scenario, Satan would rediscover his scoring touch from a decade ago and Fedotenko would replace Malone’s qualities and stats. In a worst-case scenario, well, their numbers mirror what they did with the New York Islanders. It’s easy to say that Shero should have signed this player or that player instead, but ultimately that becomes a game of fruitless speculation. At the time, Satan and Fedotenko looked like reasonable alternatives.

In the end, there are many reasons why the Penguins fell apart. Had Gonchar and Whitney been healthy and Staal been more effective, perhaps Pittsburgh would be safely in fourth place rather than battling for eighth. Had Marian Hossa decided he wanted to stay after all, perhaps the Penguin power play wouldn’t have struggled as much. Hindsight is 20/20, and unless Ray Shero manages to take the time machine from that other Van Damme movie (Timecop; come on, you all remember that one, right?) and somehow fix those problems, you’re left with little wiggling room in today’s NHL.

Fire the coach? Sometimes it’s the only thing to do.

When San Jose Sharks GM Doug Wilson fired Ron Wilson after a highly successful regular season and a disappointing playoff run, he stated that sometimes the teacher needs a new classroom and the classroom needs a new teacher. Will this be the turning point that restores the Penguins’ fortunes? Perhaps not, but considering his lack of options, it’s the only real choice Ray Shero had left to try and spark his club.

Filed in: NHL | Mike Chen's Hockey Blog | Permalink
 Tags: Michel+Therrien, Pittsburgh+Penguins, Ray+Shero,

Comments

Avatar

Great post! I think this really captures the essence of where the Pens are today. There was no question that the Pens would be weaker this season, but there was no team in the East that didn’t have major question marks.

Still, I hurts me to see Crosby playing between Dupuis and Kennedy. I love those players, but the lack of any realistic alternative is pretty damning to Shero.

As well, Fleury has been consistently mediocre to poor this season. That’s another hurdle to address.

Posted by catz27 on 02/16/09 at 03:17 PM ET

Avatar

Marian Hossa: Would things have been different had Marian Hossa selected Pittsburgh over Detroit?

I’ll answer the question.

Hossa wouldn’t take a one year deal to stay there.  He would have signed long term, and long term to a deal approaching Crosby and Malkin’s, if not equalling it.  I heard the 7 years 50 million rumors, and who knows what else was out there.

So, the Pens would have had Crosby, Malkin and Hossa… but not Satan or Fedotenko.  I don’t think either of those two have been great in Pitt this year, but if you’re worried about depth going 1 player instead of 2 isn’t exactly the way to go about improving it.

Also, after this year the Pens would have just over 41 million dollars in cap space tied up in Crosby, Malkin, Hossa, Gonchar, Whitney, Orpik and Fleury.  And no, that doesn’t include Staal, who they would almost assuredly not have been able to sign.  That would leave only 15 million in 2009-10 for 16 roster spaces, assuming the Pens would even be able to go with a full 23-man roster.

So yes, the Pens would have three elite forwards… but that’s it.  The entirety of the rest of the forward corps would be million dollar a year guys or league minimum guys.  Same deal on defense, really.  Gonchar, Whitney and Orpik would be it, at least until after the 2010 season when Gonchar’s contract is up.

I think the Pens would be different, but not necessarily better, had Hossa stayed.

Posted by HockeyinHD on 02/16/09 at 03:51 PM ET

Add a Comment

Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.

Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.

Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Feed

Most Recent Blog Posts

About Kukla’s Korner

Kukla’s Korner is updated around the clock with the work of our own talented bloggers, plus links to the best hockey writing around the internet.  We strive to bring you all the breaking hockey news as it happens.

The home page allows you to see the latest postings from every blog on the site. Subscribe here.  For general inquiries and more, please contact us anytime.

image
image




Get the top online sports betting bonuses available to sports betters!

When learning from experts it’s best to learn personally from them, or from their blog. We can provide that with poker lessons blog, your home to learn poker personally.

Do you get shocked from the luck in the game of poker? Stop getting shocked and start being a Poker Shoker.

Free Bet

As well as reading about hockey games, you can also find info about poker like which poker sites accept American Express or which are the best Canadian poker sites and also find the top rakeback sites at rakeback.net.

 

image

 

high yield savings account

Kukla’s Korner is always a free service for readers, but it costs some money to maintain. If you’re ever in a position to donate a few dollars to help out, we’d be very appreciative.

 




 


Enter the maximum amount you want to pay each month
$ USD
You will pay at least $1.00USD
Sign up for

Another way to help KK