Red & Black Hockey
Next entry: The Jus is loose! Canes win game three.
Previous entry: Ward, Canes shut out Bruins.
Chad LaRose. Goal or no goal?
by David Lee on 05/03/09 at 11:40 PM ET
Comments (6)
You be the judge:
Obviously it didn’t effect the outcome of the game, and I know I’m biased here, but I think they got it wrong.
Filed in: | Red and Black Hockey | Permalink
Comments
count it!!! when the puck was up on end it was in
Posted by ME on 05/04/09 at 01:01 AM ET
It looked in to me, and I dont care which team wins this series, so I have no bias in saying that
Posted by BigSensFan on 05/04/09 at 07:16 AM ET
Goal. Puck breaks plane of goal line. The video review crew in Toronto seems to forget that the “overhead” view’s tilt away from the net to show the goal line tends to push pucks back toward the goal line, so to speak.
Posted by George Malik from South Lyon, MI on 05/04/09 at 08:55 AM ET
Goal! LaRose was LaRobbed.
Posted by HockeyFan from NY on 05/04/09 at 01:14 PM ET
Count it. NHL Blew this one, what the heck are the replays the guys in Toronto looking at? Terrible, take more time - get all the angles and make the right call. Terrible, Terrible, Terrible.
Posted by Performance Parts on 05/05/09 at 07:33 AM ET
Add a Comment
Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.
Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.
Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Most Recent Blog Posts
Canes use special teams to beat Sabres
The ride is over for Ryan Murphy
Carolina to carry nine defenseman to start the season—Nash cut
About Red & Black Hockey
David Lee is a restaurant manager with an unused degree in political science. He can be found at Carolina Hurricanes games, Scrabble tournaments and indie-rock shows. Sometimes, all in the same day.
David has contributed to CBC.ca for their Stanley Cup playoff coverage in 2006 and to the New York Times Slapshot blog for theirs in 2008. Red and Black Hockey was founded in July of 2005.
When learning from experts it’s best to learn personally from them, or from their blog. We can provide that with poker lessons blog, your home to learn poker personally.
Do you get shocked from the luck in the game of poker? Stop getting shocked and start being a Poker Shoker
Obvious! No goal.
The call on the ice was “no goal” and apparently there was reasonable doubt in the video evidence (ie. inconclusive) that it was not a goal so the call on the ice stands.
_If_ the call on the ice would have been “goal” and it would’ve been reviewed, it would have been a goal for the exactly same reason.
Posted by ljuti from Helsinki, Finland on 05/04/09 at 12:13 AM ET