SENShobo
Next entry: Neil And Fisher Taken Out At The Knee
Previous entry: Senators Improving As Losing Streak Reaches 5
The Ottawa Slump Non-Factors
by SENShobo on 11/18/08 at 01:25 PM ET
Comments (3)
From Ian Mendes of Sportsnet, on What’s not wrong in Ottawa,
I’ve covered this team as closely as anyone over the past few seasons and I still have no clue what is wrong with this team.
So I figured it would be easier (and quicker) to write about the things that AREN’T the cause for the Senators early season struggles. Here are four things we used to always blame for Ottawa’s problems that are no longer applicable:
....
#3 - Coaching:
I know there have been whispers that perhaps Craig Hartsburg’s system is at fault for the team’s slow start. But this group has now had three coaches in this calendar year and none of them have turned this ship around. You could have Scotty Bowman or a sumo wrestler behind the bench and you probably would have the same result. (That second sumo wrestler reference is just to see if you are paying attention). Hartsburg and his coaching staff aren’t the problem here.
I figured that was probably the next direction fingers would point in, especially in the wake of the League mourning the loss of the hair, but even before last night’s game, MSG commentators noted that Spezza had said that Hartsburg’s been the most defensively detailed coach the Sens have had, and it’s been the team’s inability to work through it that’s caused their offense to sputter.
So have a read, and how about you? What do you think is wrong in the capital? (minus 100 points if you list something from Mendes’ column, without a thoroughly documented research paper to prove him wrong)
Filed in: NHL Teams, Ottawa Senators | SENShobo | Permalink
Tags: Alex+Auld, Craig+Hartsburg, Daniel+Alfredsson,
Comments
Thank you for the compliment.
I will still post this though, because part of what my blog is about is reporting on all things Senators. Mendes covers the Sens intensely, so while not everything he says is new, sometimes a reminder from someone much closer to the team than you or I helps it sink in. For some, it is new though. Some might only tune in to the game, hear “Alfie in the middle of 10 game goalless drought,” and they think he is part of the problem.
Being able to recognize his work might also allow some to recognize the work of others too, even without successes: Fisher was chastised for a long time until he notched his first goal, and then it was more circumstance than Fisher’s effort being recognized as the reason the pucks weren’t going in. Now too, it might go to Vermette, who currently has failed to score on many chances, but has been as key a part as ever of penalty killing, of defensive conscience on his lines, and he’s still one of the few Senators to fight hard enough to get the breakaways; he is getting them, but it’s the red-hot string of goalies the team has faced that’s been stopping them.
Plus, at least in bits, it made me chuckle, and that is something I value right now as a Sens fan.
Posted by SENShobo from Waterloo, ON on 11/18/08 at 02:03 PM ET
Thanks for your reply, and your points are well taken. I was not trying to be dismissive of Ian Mendes and his track record. But IMHO this particular piece was far too glib, promising something it did not deliver. The Senators’ current problems are rooted in fissures in the organization that began to manifest themselves even before their run to the Cup Final. The goaltending gap that occured when Martin Gerber was signed, the firing of Muckler, the accession of Bryan Murray to GM, the mishandling of the Emery incidents, and the significant depature of key players without adequate replacements, all of these and more are background to the current situation. As Mendes says, that’s a whole other blog. But the ground he covered has already been dug by almost everyone who writes about the Sens from Wayne Scanlan to Pierre Lebrun.
If we examine a team like the New York Rangers, whose personnel turnover equals and may even exceed the Senators’, one has to ask how it is that they have arguably the best goaltender in hockey, a cohesive system and the players to match, and currently lead the standings? Meanwhile, Ottawa has pursued a half-baked ‘we’ll be tougher to play against’ re-branding, without making the requisite improvements, particularly on defense and in goal. All credit goes to Alex Auld for keeping the team’s record respectable, but he’s no Lundqvist.
As always, I look forward to your informed opinions.
Keep up the great work!
Posted by davetherave from Ottawa, Canada on 11/19/08 at 12:12 AM ET
Add a Comment
Please limit embedded image or media size to 575 pixels wide.
Add your own avatar by joining Kukla's Korner, or logging in and uploading one in your member control panel.
Captchas bug you? Join KK or log in and you won't have to bother.
Most Recent Blog Posts
Karlsson Down, Kuba In For Sens
Personnel, Power Play Struggles For Sens
Who is SENShobo?
Fully addicted to hockey, Andrew Dodds finds it safe to live in the alleys, considering his allegiance to the Ottawa Senators in the middle of Leaf County. He tries to bring you as many worthwhile Sens stories as he can find, along with his musings on the team and the NHL in general; musings indeed since he is but a humble hockey hobo.
If you have any general comments, questions, suggestions, or concerns about myself or my blog and its content, you can post them publicly here, or drop me an email.
Email:
SENShobo Recommends
The Professionals
SensHobo, your blog is terrific but Mendes’ piece is a non-article. He says absolutely nothing.
Posted by davetherave from Ottawa, Canada on 11/18/08 at 01:55 PM ET